Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1145652, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2292746

ABSTRACT

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccines are expected to provide effective protection. However, emerging strains can cause breakthrough infection in vaccinated individuals. The immune response of vaccinated individuals who have experienced breakthrough infection is still poorly understood. Methods: Here, we studied the humoral and cellular immune responses of fully vaccinated individuals who subsequently experienced breakthrough infection due to the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 and correlated them with the severity of the disease. Results: In this study, an effective humoral response alone was not sufficient to induce effective immune protection against severe breakthrough infection, which also required effective cell-mediated immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Patients who did not require oxygen had significantly higher specific (p=0.021) and nonspecific (p=0.004) cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 at the onset of infection than those who progressed to a severe form. Discussion: Knowing both humoral and cellular immune response could allow to adapt preventive strategy, by better selecting patients who would benefit from additional vaccine boosters. Trial registration numbers: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04355351; https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04429594.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Breakthrough Infections , COVID-19/prevention & control
2.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1136723, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270700

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Data on immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients living with HIV (PLWH) over a period longer than 3 months are currently limited. We measured the immune response after BNT162b2 vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in this population. Methods: We prospectively enrolled PLWH on successful antiretroviral therapy, initiating vaccination with two doses of the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administered at six-week interval. SARS-CoV-2 humoral and cellular responses and lymphocyte cell subsets were recorded at inclusion and 6 weeks (W6), 3 months (M3) and 6 months (M6) later. Humoral, humoral strong and cellular responders were defined by IgG titers >10, ≥264BAU/mL and IFN-γ T cell release, respectively. Results: Nineteen subjects without SARS-CoV-2 infection were included (74% men, mean age 51 years, CD4 nadir 399/mm3). All subjects were humoral responders, their antibody titer peak reached at M3. Strong responders' rates were 63% and 21% at M3 and M6, respectively. CD19+CD10+ B cells had increased significantly at W6 then decreased at M3, while CD19+CD27+ B cells remained unchanged. Rates of patients with a cellular response increased from 39% at W6 to 69% at M6. Cellular responders had significantly higher CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ Effector Memory cells at inclusion (p=0.048, p=0.024, p=0.012, respectively) and CD4+ Terminally Differentiated Effector Memory cells at M3 (p=0.044). Discussion: PLWH have a robust immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but a rapid decline in humoral response from 3 months onwards, due to a blunted memory B cell response. Analysis of lymphocyte subsets may help identify optimal times for vaccine boosters.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , BNT162 Vaccine , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 995069, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243854

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has been a serious worldwide public health crisis since 2020 and is still challenging healthcare systems. New tools for the prognosis and diagnosis of COVID-19 patients remain important issues. Design: Here, we studied the metabolome of plasma samples of COVID-19 patients for the identification of prognosis biomarkers. Patients: Plasma samples of eighty-six SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects and 24 healthy controls were collected during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France in 2020. Main results: Plasma metabolome fingerprinting allowed the successful discrimination of healthy controls, mild SARS-CoV-2 subjects, and moderate and severe COVID-19 patients at hospital admission. We found a strong effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the plasma metabolome in mild cases. Our results revealed that plasma lipids and alterations in their saturation level are important biomarkers for the detection of the infection. We also identified deoxy-fructosyl-amino acids as new putative plasma biomarkers for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. Finally, our results highlight a key role for plasma levels of tryptophan and kynurenine in the symptoms of COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Our results showed that plasma metabolome profiling is an efficient tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

5.
Stem Cell Rev Rep ; 2022 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2227958

ABSTRACT

Recently, an article by Seneff et al. entitled "Innate immunosuppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs" was published in Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT). Here, we describe why this article, which contains unsubstantiated claims and misunderstandings such as "billions of lives are potentially at risk" with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, is problematic and should be retracted. We report here our request to the editor of FCT to have our rebuttal published, unfortunately rejected after three rounds of reviewing. Fighting the spread of false information requires enormous effort while receiving little or no credit for this necessary work, which often even ends up being threatened. This need for more scientific integrity is at the heart of our advocacy, and we call for large support, especially from editors and publishers, to fight more effectively against deadly disinformation.

6.
Frontiers in medicine ; 9, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2073542

ABSTRACT

Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has been a serious worldwide public health crisis since 2020 and is still challenging healthcare systems. New tools for the prognosis and diagnosis of COVID-19 patients remain important issues. Design Here, we studied the metabolome of plasma samples of COVID-19 patients for the identification of prognosis biomarkers. Patients Plasma samples of eighty-six SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects and 24 healthy controls were collected during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France in 2020. Main results Plasma metabolome fingerprinting allowed the successful discrimination of healthy controls, mild SARS-CoV-2 subjects, and moderate and severe COVID-19 patients at hospital admission. We found a strong effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the plasma metabolome in mild cases. Our results revealed that plasma lipids and alterations in their saturation level are important biomarkers for the detection of the infection. We also identified deoxy-fructosyl-amino acids as new putative plasma biomarkers for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. Finally, our results highlight a key role for plasma levels of tryptophan and kynurenine in the symptoms of COVID-19 patients. Conclusion Our results showed that plasma metabolome profiling is an efficient tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

7.
Front Immunol ; 13: 953502, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2065506

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 infection has spread rapidly around the world causing millions of deaths. Several treatments can reduce mortality and hospitalization. However, their efficacy depends on the choice of the molecule and the precise timing of its administration to ensure viral clearance and avoid a deleterious inflammatory response. Here, we investigated IFN-γ, assessed by a functional immunoassay, as a predictive biomarker for the risk of hospitalization at an early stage of infection or within one month prior to infection. Individuals with IFN-γ levels below 15 IU/mL were 6.57-times more likely to be hospitalized than those with higher values (p<0.001). As confirmed by multivariable analysis, low IFN-γ levels, age >65 years, and no vaccination were independently associated with hospitalization. In addition, we found a significant inverse correlation between low IFN-γ response and high level of IL-6 in plasma (Spearman's rho=-0.38, p=0.003). Early analysis of the IFN-γ response in a contact or recently infected subject with SARS-CoV-2 could predict hospitalization and thus help the clinician to choose the appropriate treatment avoiding severe forms of infection and hospitalization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Biomarkers , Hospitalization , Humans , Interferon-gamma , Interleukin-6 , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Frontiers in immunology ; 13, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2057700

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 infection has spread rapidly around the world causing millions of deaths. Several treatments can reduce mortality and hospitalization. However, their efficacy depends on the choice of the molecule and the precise timing of its administration to ensure viral clearance and avoid a deleterious inflammatory response. Here, we investigated IFN-γ, assessed by a functional immunoassay, as a predictive biomarker for the risk of hospitalization at an early stage of infection or within one month prior to infection. Individuals with IFN-γ levels below 15 IU/mL were 6.57-times more likely to be hospitalized than those with higher values (p<0.001). As confirmed by multivariable analysis, low IFN-γ levels, age >65 years, and no vaccination were independently associated with hospitalization. In addition, we found a significant inverse correlation between low IFN-γ response and high level of IL-6 in plasma (Spearman’s rho=-0.38, p=0.003). Early analysis of the IFN-γ response in a contact or recently infected subject with SARS-CoV-2 could predict hospitalization and thus help the clinician to choose the appropriate treatment avoiding severe forms of infection and hospitalization.

9.
EBioMedicine ; 85: 104291, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2049121

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While air pollution is a major issue due to its harmful effects on human health, few studies focus on its impact on the immune system and vulnerability to viral infections. The lockdown declared following the COVID-19 pandemic represents a unique opportunity to study the large-scale impact of variations in air pollutants in real life. We hypothesized that variations in air pollutants modify Th1 response represented by interferon (IFN) γ production. METHODS: We conducted a single center paired pilot cohort study of 58 participants, and a confirmation cohort of 320 participants in Nice (France), with for each cohort two samplings at six months intervals. We correlated the variations in the production of IFNγ after non-specific stimulation of participants' immune cells with variations in key regulated pollutants: NO2, O3, PM2.5, and PM10 and climate variables. Using linear regression, we studied the effects of variations of each pollutant on the immune response. FINDINGS: In the pilot cohort, IFNγ production significantly decreased by 25.7% post-lockdown compared to during lockdown, while NO2 increased significantly by 46.0%. After the adjustment for climate variations during the study period (sunshine and temperature), we observed a significant effect of NO2 variation on IFNγ production (P=0.03). In the confirmation cohort IFNγ decreased significantly by 47.8% and after adjustment for environmental factors and intrinsic characteristics we observed a significant effect of environmental factors: NO2, PM10, O3, climatic conditions (sunshine exposure, relative humidity) on variation in IFNγ production (P=0.005, P<0.001, P=0.001, P=0.002 and P<0.001 respectively) but not independently from the BMI at inclusion and the workplace P=0.007 and P<0.001 respectively). INTERPRETATION: We show a weakening of the antiviral cellular response in correlation with an increase of pollutants exposition. FUNDING: Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Conseil Départemental des Alpes-Maritimes and Region Sud.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , COVID-19 , Humans , Interferon-gamma , Nitrogen Dioxide/analysis , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/analysis , Cohort Studies , Pandemics , Pilot Projects , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects
10.
Eur J Cancer ; 162: 182-193, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1838736

ABSTRACT

Taking into account higher risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 or death among patients with cancer, as well as impaired immunogenicity after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, in addition to waning immunity, booster dosing appears mandatory in this patient population. This review sought to provide reasonable evidence so as to assist oncologists in their daily practice, helping them decide when an anti-SARS-Cov2 antibody (Ab) dosage should be scheduled after a full two-dose vaccination and, if necessary, propose an early third dose (D3). Such D3 could apply to non-responder patients with anti-Spike (S) Abs titres <40 binding Ab unit (BAU)/mL. For lowresponder patients with anti-S Ab titres between 40 BAU/mL and 100/260 BAU/mL (suggested area of uncertainty), an early D3 may similarly be proposed. Nevertheless, this D3 could be administered in a less urgent manner, taking into account associated comorbidities and regional epidemic incidence rates. This latter strategy may comprise a monthly dosage of anti-S titres so as to better assess the kinetics of waning immunity. For responder patients with anti-S titres above 260 BAU/mL, we suggest to follow the recommendations outlined for the general population. Given this context, patients with anti-S titres above 1000 BAU/mL should be given the possibility to undergo anti-S titre control after three months, designed to assess rapid humoral waning immunity. We strongly recommend that patients with cancer be included into observational serological monitoring studies or clinical trials that are dedicated to severe immunocompromised patients without any humoral seroconversion after D3.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Immunity, Humoral , Immunization Schedule , Immunization, Secondary , Neoplasms/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Monitoring, Immunologic , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Seroconversion , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vaccine Efficacy
11.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 824563, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1785358

ABSTRACT

Background: The optimal isolation time of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU) is debated. We investigated the impact of two different COVID-19 patient isolation time strategies on healthcare workers (HCW) contamination, intensity of nursing care and potential associated adverse events. Methods: We prospectively included all consecutive COVID-19 patients and HCW in our ICU in the first two pandemic waves (March to May 2020 and August to November 2020). Specific isolation measures for COVID-19 patients were released after two negative RT-PCR assays in the first wave and 14 days after the onset of symptoms in the second wave. Contamination of HCW was assessed at the end of each pandemic wave by combining both a RT-PCR assay and a serological test. Results: Overall, 117 COVID-19 patients and 73 HCW were included. Despite an earlier release from isolation after ICU admission in the second than in the first wave [6 (4-8) vs. 15 (11-19) days, p < 0.01], the proportion of HCW with a positive serological test (16 vs. 17%, p = 0.94) or with a positive RT-PCR assay (3 vs. 5%, p = 0.58) was not different between the two waves. Although a lower nurse-to-bed ratio, the intensity of nursing care was higher in the second than in the first wave. A longer isolation time was associated with accidental extubation (OR = 1.18, 95%CI:1.07-1.35, p = 0.005) but neither with ventilator-associated pneumonia nor with dysglycemia. Conclusion: A shorter isolation time of COVID-19 patients in ICU was not associated with higher HCW contamination, while a longer isolation time seemed to be associated with higher accidental extubation.

12.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 864, 2022 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1684028

ABSTRACT

Patients with hematological malignancies have impaired immune response after two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Here, in this observational study (registration number HDH F20210324145532), we measure SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike antibodies, neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses after immune stimulation with a third dose (D3) of the same vaccine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 13), B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 14), and multiple myeloma (n = 16)). No unexpected novel side effects are reported. Among 25 patients with positive anti-S titers before D3, 23 (92%) patients increase their anti-S and neutralizing antibody titer after D3. All 18 (42%) initially seronegative patients remain negative. D3 increases the median IFN-γ secretion in the whole cohort and induces IFN-γ secretion in a fraction of seronegative patients. Our data thus support the use of a third vaccine dose amongst patients with lymphoid malignancies, even though some of them will still have vaccine failure.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , Hematologic Neoplasms , Immunity, Cellular/immunology , Immunity, Humoral/immunology , Immunization, Secondary/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology
13.
EBioMedicine ; 73: 103679, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1595805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The immunogenicity of a two-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine regimen is low in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Here, we provide a thorough assessment of the immunogenicity of a three-dose COVID-19 vaccine regimen in this population. METHODS: We performed a prospective longitudinal study in sixty-one KT recipients given three doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. We performed semi-structured pharmacovigilance interviews and monitored donor-specific antibodies and kidney function. We compared levels of anti-spike IgG, pseudo-neutralization activity against vaccine homologous and heterologous variants, frequency of spike-specific interferon (IFN)-γ-secreting cells, and antigen-induced cytokine production 28 days after the second and third doses. FINDINGS: Reactions to vaccine were mild. One patient developed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after the second dose which could be explained by non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Spike-specific IgG seroconversion raised from 44·3% (n=27) after the second dose to 62·3% (n=38) after the third dose (p<0·05). The mean level of spike-specific IgG increased from 1620 (SD, 3460) to 8772 (SD, 16733) AU/ml (p<0·0001). Serum neutralizing activity increased after the third dose for all variants of concern tested including the Delta variant (p<0·0001). The frequency of spike-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells increased from 19·9 (SD, 56·0) to 64·0 (SD, 76·8) cells/million PBMCs after the third dose (p<0·0001). A significant increase in IFN-γ responses was also observed in patients who remained seronegative after three doses (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: A third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine increases both cross-variant neutralizing antibody and cellular responses in KT recipients with an acceptable tolerability profile. FUNDING: Nice University Hospital, University Cote d'Azur.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Kidney Transplantation , Aged , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Autoantibodies/blood , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Female , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , HLA Antigens/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/cytology , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
14.
Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie - FMC ; 1(8, Supplement 1):A238, 2021.
Article in French | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1520925

ABSTRACT

Introduction Les injections de produit de comblement sont des gestes esthétiques bien maîtrisés. L’utilisation de produits récents, associés à une meilleure connaissance des méthodes d’injection limitent les complications. La granulomatose faciale est rare mais peut entraîner une gêne importante et répercussions esthétiques invalidantes. Matériel et méthodes Une femme de 73 ans, sans antécédent, présentait brutalement un œdème induré du visage, quelques semaines après une COVID-19 symptomatique mais sans critère de sévérité. Aucune amélioration n’était notée après antihistaminiques, antibiotiques, métronidazole topique, dermocorticoïdes, prescrits pour respectivement différents diagnostics : urticaire, érysipèle, rosacée, dermite au masque, eczéma. En dermatologie, on notait des formations nodulaires fermes, infiltrées à la partie basse du visage et au front, suivant les rides, sans symptôme associé. Après un interrogatoire orienté, elle rapportait des injections des sillons naso-géniens et du front en 1983 (produit inconnu). La biopsie cutanée confirmait une granulomatose sur injections (granulomes et vacuoles dermiques), possiblement de silicone. Les examens complémentaires dont un scanner thoracique étaient normaux, éliminant une sarcoïdose. À 4 mois du diagnostic, le taux d’interféron-α (IFN-α) après stimulation in vitro était bas (5,56pg/mL) alors que les taux d’IL-1ß (1263pg/mL) et d’IL-6 (>5304pg/mL) étaient très augmentés. Une corticothérapie générale (CTG, 1mg/kg/j, 50mg/j) associée à de la doxycycline 200mg/j était débutées, permettant une régression quasi complète mais avec rechute à la baisse de 15 à 10mg/j, puis échec de CTG à 0,8mg/j+hydroxychloroquine. Finalement du méthotrexate 10mg/semaine était débuté avec régression complète de l’œdème. A 7 mois du début du traitement, la CTG était arrêtée, le méthotrexate maintenu, sans récidive. Discussion Les granulomatoses faciales aux produits de comblement peuvent survenir plusieurs mois après l’injection, exceptionnellement après plusieurs années. Normalement, ces produits à effet prolongé restent localisés aux zones d’injection, sans réaction immunologique. Des processus infectieux (e.g. virose, soins dentaires, vaccination) peuvent stimuler la formation de granulomes ;récemment des cas ont été décrits après infection par SARS-CoV2 ou après vaccination par vaccin ARNm (plus fréquemment avec Moderna© et après la seconde dose). Chez deux patients VHC+, le traitement par IFN-α a pu induire des granulomes faciaux. Une production d’IFN-α rapide et importante chez les patients Covid-19 est corrélée à une rapide élimination du virus et des infections peu sévères/modérées. Notre patiente ayant « contrôlé » sa COVID-19 par la production d’IFN-α, aurait pu stimuler en parallèle la formation de granulomes. Le dosage bas d’IFN-α fait à distance n’élimine pas cette hypothèse.

15.
Eur J Cancer ; 150: 232-239, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1210068

ABSTRACT

The impacts of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic on cancer care are multiple, entailing a high risk of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with cancer treated by chemotherapy. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines represent an opportunity to decrease the rate of severe COVID-19 cases in patients with cancer and also to restore normal cancer care. Patients with cancer to be targeted for vaccination are difficult to define owing to the limited contribution of these patients in the phase III trials testing the different vaccines. It seems appropriate to vaccinate not only patients with cancer with ongoing treatment or with a treatment having been completed less than 3 years ago but also household and close contacts. High-risk patients with cancer who are candidates for priority access to vaccination are those treated by chemotherapy. The very high-priority population includes patients with curative treatment and palliative first- or second-line chemotherapy, as well as patients requiring surgery or radiotherapy involving a large volume of lung, lymph node and/or haematopoietic tissue. When possible, vaccination should be carried out before cancer treatment begins. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can be performed during chemotherapy while avoiding periods of neutropenia and lymphopenia. For organisational reasons, vaccination should be performed in cancer care centres with messenger RNA vaccines (or non-replicating adenoviral vaccines in non-immunocompromised patients). Considering the current state of knowledge, the benefit-risk ratio strongly favours SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of all patients with cancer. To obtain more data concerning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, it is necessary to implement cohorts of vaccinated patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , Neoplasms/complications , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Bull Cancer ; 108(6): 614-626, 2021 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1202973

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has a major impact at all stages of cancer treatment. Risk of death from COVID-19 in patients treated for a cancer is high. COVID-19 vaccines represent a major issue to decrease the rate of severe forms of the COVID-19 cases and to maintain a normal cancer care. It is difficult to define the target population for vaccination due to the limited data available and the lack of vaccine doses available. It appears theoretically important to vaccinate patients with active cancer treatment or treated since less than three years, as well as their family circle. In France, patients actually defined at "high risk" for priority access to vaccination are those with a cancer treated by chemotherapy. A panel of experts recently defined another "very high-priority" population, which includes patients with curative or palliative first or second-line chemotherapy, as well as patients requiring surgery or radiotherapy involving a large lung volume, lymph nodes and/or of hematopoietic tissue. Ideally, it is best to vaccinate before cancer treatment. Despite the lack of published data, COVID-19 vaccines can also be performed during chemotherapy by avoiding periods of bone marrow aplasia and if possible, to do it in cancer care centers. It is necessary to implement cohorts with immunological and clinical monitoring of vaccinated cancer patients. To conclude, considering the current state of knowledge, the benefit-risk ratio strongly favours COVID-19 vaccination of all cancer patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Neoplasms/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/supply & distribution , Contraindications , France/epidemiology , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Pandemics , Vaccination
17.
Front Physiol ; 12: 611772, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1154242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Renal involvement in syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been retrospectively described, especially acute kidney injury (AKI). However, quantitative proteinuria assessment and its implication in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain unknown. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter study in France, we collected clinical and biological data including urinary protein to creatine ratio (UPCR) in patients presenting with moderate to severe COVID-19. Clinical outcome was analyzed according to the level of UPCR. RESULTS: 42/45 patients (93.3%) had renal involvement (abnormal urinary sediment and/or AKI). Significant proteinuria occurred in 60% of patients. Urine protein electrophoresis showed tubular protein excretion in 83.8% of patients with proteinuria. Inflammatory parametersand D-dimer concentrations correlated with proteinuria level. Patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission had higher proteinuria (p = 0.008). On multivariate analysis, proteinuria greater than 0.3 g/g was related to a higher prevalence of ICU admission [OR = 4.72, IC95 (1.16-23.21), p = 0.03], acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [OR = 6.89, IC95 (1.41-53.01, p = 0.02)], nosocomial infections [OR = 3.75, IC95 (1.11-13.55), p = 0.03], longer inpatient hospital stay (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Renal involvement is common in moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Proteinuria at baseline is an independent risk factor for increased hospitalization duration and ICU admission in patients with COVID-19.

18.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 603961, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1083700

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged in Wuhan in December 2019 and has since spread across the world. Even though the majority of patients remain completely asymptomatic, some develop severe systemic complications. In this prospective study we compared the immunological profile of 101 COVID-19 patients with either mild, moderate or severe form of the disease according to the WHO classification, as well as of 50 healthy subjects, in order to identify functional immune factors independently associated with severe forms of COVID-19. Plasma cytokine levels, and cytokine levels upon in vitro non-specific stimulation of innate and adaptive immune cells, were measured at several time points during the course of the disease. As described previously, inflammatory cytokines IL1ß, IL6, IL8, and TNFα associated with cytokine storm were significantly increased in the plasma of moderate and severe COVID-19 patients (p < 0.0001 for all cytokines). During follow-up, plasma IL6 levels decreased between the moment of admission to the hospital and at the last observation carried forward for patients with favorable outcome (p = 0.02148). After in vitro stimulation of immune cells from COVID-19 patients, reduced levels of both type I and type II interferons (IFNs) upon in vitro stimulation were correlated with increased disease severity [type I IFN (IFNα): p > 0.0001 mild vs. moderate and severe; type II IFN (IFNγ): p = 0.0002 mild vs. moderate and p < 0.0001 mild vs. severe] suggesting a functional exhaustion of IFNs production. Stimulated IFNα levels lower than 2.1 pg/ml and IFNγ levels lower than 15 IU/mL at admission to the hospital were associated with more complications during hospitalization (p = 0.0098 and p =0.0002, respectively). A low IFNγ level was also confirmed by multivariable analysis [p = 0.0349 OR = 0.98 (0.962; 0.999)] as an independent factor of complications. In vitro treatment with type IFNα restored type IFNγ secretion in COVID-19 patients while the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL6 and IL1ß remained stable or decreased, respectively. These results (a) demonstrate a functional exhaustion of both innate and adaptive immune response in severe forms of COVID-19; (b) identify IFNα and IFNγ as new potential biomarkers of severity; and (c) highlight the importance of targeting IFNs when considering COVID-19 treatment in order to re-establish a normal balance between inflammatory and Th1 effector cytokines.

19.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 608804, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1081183

ABSTRACT

Frontline health care workers (HCWs) have been particularly exposed to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since the start of the pandemic but the clinical features and immune responses of those infected with SARS-CoV-2 have not been well described. In a prospective single center cohort study, we enrolled 196 frontline HCWs exposed to the SARS-Cov-2 and 60 patients with moderate and severe forms of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Serological tests and cytokines assay were performed to analyze SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity. Of the 196 HCWs tested, 15% had specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and 45% of seropositive HCWs were strictly asymptomatic. However, in comparison to moderate and severe forms, HCWs with mild or asymptomatic forms of COVID-19 showed lower specific IgA and IgG peaks, consistent with their mild symptoms, and a robust immune cellular response, illustrated by a high production of type I and II interferons. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this interferon functional immune assay, routinely applicable, can be useful in predicting the risk of severe forms of COVID-19.

20.
JAMA Dermatol ; 157(2): 202-206, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-959045

ABSTRACT

Importance: Chilblain-like lesions have been reported during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The pathophysiology of such manifestations remains largely unknown. Objective: To perform a systematic clinical, histologic, and biologic assessment in a cohort of patients with chilblain-like lesions occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective case series carried out with a COVID-19 multidisciplinary consultation group at the University Hospital of Nice, France, 40 consecutive patients presenting with chilblain-like lesions were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients underwent a thorough general and dermatologic examination, including skin biopsies, vascular investigations, biologic analyses, interferon-alpha (IFN-α) stimulation and detection, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serologic analysis. Results: Overall, 40 consecutive patients with chilblain-like lesions were included. Most patients were young, with a median (range) age of 22 (12-67) years; 19 were male and 21 were female. The clinical presentation was highly reproducible with chilblain-like lesions mostly on the toes. Bullous and necrotic evolution was observed in 11 patients. Acrocyanosis or cold toes were reported in 19 (47.5%) cases. Criteria compatible with COVID-19 cases were noted in 11 (27.5%) within 6 weeks prior to the eruption. The real-time PCR (rt-PCR) testing results were negative in all cases. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 serology results were positive in 12 patients (30%). D-dimer concentration levels were elevated in 24 (60.0%) cases. Cryoglobulinemia and parvovirus B19 serologic results were negative for all tested patients. The major histologic findings were features of lymphocytic inflammation and vascular damage with thickening of venule walls and pericyte hyperplasia. A significant increase of IFN-α production after in vitro stimulation was observed in the chilblain population compared with patients with mild-severe acute COVID-19. Conclusions and Relevance: Taken together, our results suggest that chilblain-like lesions observed during the COVID-19 pandemic represent manifestations of a viral-induced type I interferonopathy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04344119.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Chilblains/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/immunology , Chilblains/immunology , Child , Female , Humans , Interferon-alpha/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL